It's good that the British Government can ban things they consider inappropriate. After all, they know what's best for their people. We should allow the government to do the same thing here. Governments always know what's best for the people. Once we get rid of the Second Amendment, it'll be a lot easier to implement...more

READ THE FORM!

Luv2care is correct. All of the posters above who disagree are incorrect.   This was NOT a private sale. It was done through an FFL dealer, and required a Federal Form to be filled out. Under FEDERAL LAW, if you check off the box that indicates you are the "buyer", you CANNOT "give" the gun to anyone else. By checki...more

WRONG! The background check on Mr. Kelly WAS done. Mark had a clean record, so the only thing that kept him from possessing the gun on the spot was the local law which forced a wait period of twenty days. That wait period may have kept Kelly from going to jail, as he may have made an ILLEGAL STRAW PURCHASE without kno...more

Who are you to dictate to me what I need and don't need? Kindly keep out of my business, as I keep out of yours. Let ME decide what I need and what I don't need!

2q3RtzLOw T, Kindly Stop confusing the issue with facts! Oh, and you spelled 2q3RtzLOw T wrong! Looks like Zappafan -3 is going to have some company in the corner!   I have a question: Can the gun store owner who sold the rifle to Kelly legally release the information Kelly provided on his Federal form? If so, th...more

Zappafan-3, You missed the capital "C" in christmas. You too have earned the wrath of Agit-prop. Now go in the corner for a time out!

If a purchaser of a gun makes a false statement on a federal form as to the identity of the ULTIMATE recipient of the gun, than that is considered to be a "straw purchase" By checking that he is the "buyer", he is testifying that he will be the ultimate "possessor" of that firearm. His statements to the contrary indic...more

Agit-prop, I run everything through MSN spell check. That would make THEM the moron.