profileDapAd&PG=MSPGEN&AP=1089300250Profile-Public-Combined-page1|SCPProfilesocial.msn.comProfileen-usProfilesocial.msn.com/profile/default.aspxsocial.msn.com/profile/default.aspx?urlName=XBooRpSVas_KvYsO-Ip8x7Unbpdl1p9Yf&mkt=en-us0Public profileProfileProfileProfilePlease type a nickname.There was an error. Please try again later.a408ac1034e74f469c754ed59efd0d49Falsemoreen-US
They conveniently left out the age of the younger girl but it's still "statutory rape" no matter what the sexual preference is being that the girl is a minor. Now the 18 year old may have to register as a sex offender and deal with that her entire life. If rights were truly equal she would because that's what happens ...more
It's been a decade and yet Brad is still talking about Jen. and in the mist of his mistress baby-mama mutilating herself out of Fear that someday she might get sick. Wow.... That in itself says speaks volumes but not about Jen. LMAO
If she is 22, then how is she still a Teen Mom? Hell, she was a legal adult when she made that porn tape and when she pregnant. That's why no one is locked up. It's not like she was 15 or still a minor. Being immature, irresponsible and a nasty skank does not make her a minor. Personally, I'm tired of desperate whores...more
Any restaurant or organization can donate whatever they want to any Church. It is then up to the Church how they use it. So what's the problem; only Homos have rights now?
If making thong panties For 7-14 Year old girls with the captions "Eyecandy" and "Winkwink" or padded push-up bikini bra tops doesn't embarrass A&F nothing will. The point is that A&F have no respect for females. Anyone who came from a female, you really should not be buying from A&F.
Good for her but Abercrombie & Fitch is a SHYT Label anyway. I have been disgusted with them since 2002 when they came out with Thongs (the panties not the sandals) for 7-14 year old girls. They even had the audacity to put captions like "eye candy" and "winkwink" on them. They repeated their pedophilic ways in 2011 by...more
Why? If she modeled for VC then it's already done. She should get credit for it regardless to her present day size. She obviously didn't loose her ability to model by being a normal weight, seeing as though she's still doing it .
Is that what the letter read " ....We are revoking your scholarship because we found a less qualified black applicant who is in need of it" or is that your opinion? I think the latter. Maybe her need was greater than your daughters but don't assume she was less qualified than your daughter or that it's because she is ...more