profileDapAd&PG=MSPGEN&AP=1089300250Profile-Public-Combined-page1|SCPProfilesocial.msn.comProfileen-usProfilesocial.msn.com/profile/default.aspxsocial.msn.com/profile/default.aspx?urlName=XC44mjGM4zxeV3l-wxpDcQAapBlPAqiSQ&mkt=en-us0Public profileProfileProfileProfilePlease type a nickname.There was an error. Please try again later.312bc9e6f5034c0998ef3d0c0b449f6cFalsemoreen-US
I'm "forced" to pay for cancer treatments for smokers and diabetes/heart attack/etc treatments for fatties, how is this any different? You also realize that one non-complicated pregnancy costs more than a lifetime of birth control, don't you? Strictly from a cost standpoint, the birth control is the better option.
The argument wasn't about free birth control, it was whether insurance companies should include it in their coverage. You may or may not agree, I can see both sides, but let's at least be clear about what the context is. Also, most birth control perscriptions are written to married women to aid in family planning, not ...more
It works basically the same was as most private pensions. The longer you wait, the higher the monthly benefit. It's based on live expectancies and the amount a person will draw, should they live to the average age. You start at 62 and live to 86, you get so much per month, you wait until your 66 and live to 86, your be...more