profileDapAd&PG=MSPGEN&AP=1089300250Profile-Public-Combined-page1|SCPProfilesocial.msn.comProfileen-usProfilesocial.msn.com/profile/default.aspxsocial.msn.com/profile/default.aspx?urlName=XDV07Gt1tkloa0x8M6uETUbWF8SjLntbs&mkt=en-us0Public profileProfileProfileProfilePlease type a nickname.There was an error. Please try again later.4a702cd97e434e9ebc547872e7579d40Falsemoreen-US
As I said above, you don't need a holy man to get married, but you do need a license.
How can people be so dumb? Are they not married? Did they forget the license? the blood tests etc...
When the religious person is performing the ceremony, they are doing both a civil marriage and a religious marriage. ...more
A Sharp. Are you married? marriage is not inhernelty a religious issue, its a legal contract between two people.
You can get married without a religious leader, but you can't get married without a license, issued by the government. You can say you're married in the eyes of God or whatever, but if you don't h...more
Quote From MG
"Maybe if Democrats were not so indoctrinated in Marxist ideas of taking from those that have to give to those that need..."
Sounds like Jesus Christ to me. Ironic how un-republican it sounds given their "faith based" platform...
Enough with the 57 states cr4p. If you include the other territories of the US, you do get 57 "states" that presidential candidates have to worry about. Like Puerto Rico, American Soma, and others. Romney won Guam by the way. Google US Territories..They actually get to vote. Sheesh try something other...more
I'm really sick of the 57 states thing. Did you not know that Wikipedia is back on line today?
If you include DC and the US Major territories you get 56, Lets throw in the minor territories together to make 57. 50 + DC + Puerto Rico, Northern Mariana Islands, US Virgin Islands, American Samoa,...more
LOM while I don't disagree with your idea to save a few bucks. But your numbers add up to about 1 Billion dollars, not 1 Trillion dollars you're off a factor of 1000.
So unfortunately there really isn't enough savings there to do more than spit on a house fire.
Sorry, but we need to look at the "reven...more
I'd be obliged if you would give the current President of the United States of America a little more respect than to refer to him with your derisive nick names.
It's your offhanded offensive attitude that actually weakens your arguments, and makes it easier to disregard your opinions.
The only reason trucks are more economically feasible then rail is because of the shift in federal subsidies from rail to highways.
If you are comparing to flying, don't forget the 2 hours of security nonsense you have to endure, plus layovers connections etc. Factor those things, in, and high-speed rail up and...more
To report abusive content:
Select the post to go to the related message board page.