my shortest answer is "yes"

I dont care who picks it up.  I wont go to see it.

The crime he was convicted of has nothing to do with the Newtown tragedy.  While the judge believes his intentions are to show support, there is no actual justification and this seems to me to be grounds for an appeal since this cannot be constitutional.

Whaa...  what a bunch of frickin' whiny @$$ cry babies who have to complain about everything.  If they didn't have something to complain about, they would complain about THAT.

The bottom lime is that sound engineering practices, not only work, but are preferable to exploiting motorists through the use of ticket cameras and related automated enforcement devices

Disney is Good...  depends on the jurisdiction.  Some jurisdictions do report to insurance.  Depends on how the contract is drafted among a number of factors .

If enforcement cameras were truly about safety and set up only where the speed limits are properly engineered and / or the yellow light cycle for the intersection is properly timed then they would catch the truely dangerous motoring behavior...  I would support that.    Unfortunately, this is not about safety and is ...more

Similarly you never see red light cameras set up in intersections where the yellow light cycle is timed correctly either.    The cameras can't generate enough revenue at red lights that are properly engineered.  Once motorists demand the yellow cycle is timed correctly and a qulified traffic engineer sets this up ba...more

Despite claims to the contrary, photo radar is used in locations characterized by high traffic volume and under-posted speed limits. It is not profitable to use photo radar on residential streets, low volume roads or where speed limits are posted at the 85th percentile.   For me this begs the question in every inst...more