profileDapAd&PG=MSPGEN&AP=1089300250Profile-Public-Combined-page1|SCPProfilesocial.msn.comProfileen-usProfilesocial.msn.com/profile/default.aspxsocial.msn.com/profile/default.aspx?urlName=XOGupfCiOEiXCVGzvxbmXLHhd8CCdIKFO&mkt=en-us0Public profileProfileProfileProfilePlease type a nickname.There was an error. Please try again later.a8b0c5af7afc42ec9286f69d645369f2Falsemoreen-US
I think it was a good thing they maybe ballplayers but they have just as much rights as any other star's would you don't mess with stars even Bruce springsteen has gaurds its just not done
yes true but he needs to sell the who thing to get rid of it and start one thats only for every one even ones with out money and phones to have a fb accout it doesn't matter its suppose to be a free thing for kids and its really not
god don't have money nor needs money and he needs to get rid of it if hes not going to give the kids whoes parent's don't want there kids to have any money and phones nor passwords to get on for free and leave them on and let them have accounts on it
true he needs to sell it all as a whole conpany and get out give it to some one else so they could take it and give it a nother name as another conpany and let everyone on it just as a kids site without asked for phone numbers and names and passwords and money
I think that school should let her i think there being over idtiotfided if i wanted to wear my captain kirks unform shirt I would theres no point its not being fair it doesn't matter its a a pic for hevens let her have it
new it would be a flop, cause face book was and is suppose to be made for kids to play on not ment as a adlut busness corp. and to make one out of a free thing like myspace and face book is just not going to work it should return to the old old face book stlye for kids or make another one for kids and people that don'...more
5/18/2012
To report abusive content:
Select the post to go to the related message board page.