profileDapAd&PG=MSPGEN&AP=1089300250Profile-Public-Combined-page1|SCPProfilesocial.msn.comProfileen-usProfilesocial.msn.com/profile/default.aspxsocial.msn.com/profile/default.aspx?urlName=XVwBHS0TAVuMOimNu_N_LPOHqJGXAxq7F&mkt=en-us0Public profileProfileProfileProfilePlease type a nickname.There was an error. Please try again later.739df057b2eb45b899da18ebbff9108cFalsemoreen-US
Agreed with other comment: what's this list's definition of "Quality" -all those VWs? And the MINI is a very troublesome car. I question this survey. Big Time.
So, according to this article, the Chevrolet logo was [probably] a doodle, ie: it means nothing. Not that I have anything against Chevrolet, but why put a paragraph about a logo that means nothing in an article specifically about logos that do mean something... strange.
The Votl's a cool car, I got to drive one for hours one day. It's worth the $40,000, just not $40,000 plus the "dealer markup" -and know we know the car didn't deserve that mark up, did it?
Pretty little cars.
I dig the Tru and the Code looks a bit like the 1-Series... but better in my eyes.
And one of the best-handling cars I've ever driven is the 2WD Equinox -no kidding.
(But the GM cars I"m really fiending are the Ciel and the ELR. But they won't be cheap.)
Lastly: GM needs a good Chevy ...more
Looks promising! But agreed: a naturally aspirated 4 cylinder engine in a Cadillac does not sound appropriate.... (how about a hybrid?) But will Cadillac make a convertible version to really stick it to the 3 series? -that's what I wanna know!
1/22/2012
To report abusive content:
Select the post to go to the related message board page.