profileDapAd&PG=MSPGEN&AP=1089300250Profile-Public-Combined-page1|SCPProfilesocial.msn.comProfileen-usProfilesocial.msn.com/profile/default.aspxsocial.msn.com/profile/default.aspx?urlName=X_ZM7Lqn9s-Qaae8jOOAJ0sIhedhtlmvw&mkt=en-us0Public profileProfileProfileProfilePlease type a nickname.There was an error. Please try again later.8a6d1cbc064946ffb73d8b83f9ec895bFalsemoreen-US
Another "no" vote here. Burned once with GM and not about to repeat the mistake in the hope that it will turn out better this time. Isn't that one definition is insanity. Yes, I do realize that as a short term play, GM stock might even be profitable.
Here is an idea: If GM is such a great buy, let the UAW dou...more
AGS41 asked "Why is the social security tax regressive? . . . . .Let everyone pay SS on their full income as does the middle class and we could also be retiring at 60 and enjoy a few years of peace."
Actually, 90% of taxpayers already pay Social Security tax on their full earnings. The top 10%, who make more...more
10/28/2010
To report abusive content:
Select the post to go to the related message board page.