Profile - Recent

profileDapAd&PG=MSPGEN&AP=1089300250 Profile-Public-Combined-page1|SCPProfilesocial.msn.comProfileen-usProfilesocial.msn.com/profile/default.aspxsocial.msn.com/profile/default.aspx?urlName=X_erntOufLQvoAhCi2P-uMNt21m5CVaJz&mkt=en-us0Public profileProfileProfileProfile Please type a nickname.There was an error. Please try again later.a71151f4b9ef4fe69337f69a24ed6366False moreen-US
Welcome, dachsie lady

User Contribution Statistics

Total number of posts:268
Board Posts
0
Comments
268
Reviews
0
Joined 199 days ago

Advertisement



Contribution Navigation Menu

Profile pagination controls


UserCommentsCOMMENT

Article Comment

What XFringeX said!
20 hours ago
UserCommentsCOMMENT

Article Comment

So, you're a necropheliac huh?
21 hours ago
UserCommentsCOMMENT

Article Comment

that dude has some seriously big testicles.
21 hours ago
UserCommentsCOMMENT

Article Comment

<snicker>  you took the words out of my mouth Farmall!  Except i would have returned the favor and called the boys "little pr!cks".
1 day ago
UserCommentsCOMMENT

Article Comment

Any school I have ever heard of that offers sex education classes REQUIRES parental consent for the student to take the class.  If the school OFFERS sex ed classes and the parent AGREES to allow their student to take the class, then the class should be comprehensive and cover birth control methods as well as abstinence...more
1 day ago
UserCommentsCOMMENT

Article Comment

Most schools teaching a sex ed class require parental consent for the child to participate in the class.  The question being presented here is IF a sex ed class is being presented, (and a parent has given consent for their child to attend it) should they be allowed to present only the abstinence approach, or should it ...more
1 day ago
UserCommentsCOMMENT

Article Comment

Anywhere sex ed is being taught, it should be mandatory that it is a comprehensive course and does not dwell specifically on abstinence.  Birth control should absolutely be part of the subject matter.
1 day ago
UserCommentsCOMMENT

Article Comment

I did not personally find the commercial all that funny.  Perhaps it was sexist, but then again, I'm a feminist so I really don't care (any more than a chauvinist would care if the commercial was belittling females).  I will say that in order for "humor" to be "funny", there has to be some basis or grain of truth to th...more
1 day ago
UserCommentsCOMMENT

Article Comment

Raymond Burr was not disabled when he played the original Ironsides.  I don't think disable actors should be barred from auditioning for parts portraying disabled individuals, but I don't think they should be given preference based specifically on thier disability.  The best ACTOR or ACTRESS should be given the part.
1 day ago
To report abusive content:
  1. Select the post to go to the related message board page.
  2. Under the offensive post, click Report Abuse.
  3. Fill out the form and click Report.