profileDapAd&PG=MSPGEN&AP=1089300250Profile-Public-Combined-page1|SCPProfilesocial.msn.comProfileen-usProfilesocial.msn.com/profile/default.aspxsocial.msn.com/profile/default.aspx?urlName=Xj_ApRkxPHGa02XJ0jKuQHjq4S4aZpdeM&mkt=en-us0Public profileProfileProfileProfilePlease type a nickname.There was an error. Please try again later.3b3182007b4743728a991fed96e3804dFalsemoreen-US
That is explained in the article. They are spreading the cost over the lifetime of production as well as the technology that was used in other cars. Please read the article before posting. The peeps that wrote the original article are responsible for the "loss per car number."
Can't afford it, just like I can't afford a Volt or a Leaf, or a Karma. Luckily, the government supplements the companies' incomes so they can survive -I mean, gives them funds for research and production to help the environment. However, the government does provide the (laughable in comparison) tax break for purchaser...more
When a company has to put a huge decal indicating that the new vehicle is indeed the "all-new" model, how is one of the "Best of the Windy City." I guess there wasn't much else to offer?
Nice commentary. However, I am not a big fan of the car, but this article's snub of the Chevy Cruz is a little blatant. Not to mention, the only mention of Honda, is the brief mention of the CRZ.
What were the criteria used to create this "Stellar Commuter Car" article? -neat cars Griffey liked? I wonder if he ...more