Did you bother to actually read the article? This camp is designed for 13-17 year old teen boys.

Did you bother to actually read the article, dummy? This camp is for 13-17 year old boys.

If we exist by then, and  don't already use up Earth's natural resources ,maybe.

" There are far better natural ways to ward off burns and skin cancer." Like what?

But who knows..Sh e could have been lying..

This article is misleading If she separately bought lottery tickets, outside the pool from with her coworkers, and one of them happened to be the winning ticket--I see no reason for her to share it with her coworkers.

This article is kind of lame. I came in here thinking that you would cover more than just the predicted costs, such as the actual risks of LASIK. But you didn't. Ughhh.

Apparently the person/people who wrote this article,assumes that every man can afford these expensive clothing to "look great." I can't believe  people are buying into these magazines with "perfect" looking models wearing expensive name brand clothing, and trying to look like them. Really now.. In this day and age...more

I think this article fails. Why? It's an article from MSN, that's  directed not to the everyday man, but more to "Rich Men" who can afford typical name brand clothing. $1000 for a suit, $+500 for a pair of shoes, and $150 for a shirt? Are you freaking kidding me?!? 90% of men don't have that kind of money to afford s...more